On-going discussion of traffic management if energy pipe goes ahead

Councillors met officers from the County Networks Team today to inform discussion on the construction traffic management plan (CTMP) document submitted with the energy pipe application. We wanted to make sure that disruption to residents is kept to a minimum if the application gets consent, and give the Networks Team officers information about likely issues that may merit their further consideration.

Here are some of the points we discussed:

  • councillors will put a hard copy of the CTMP in Bury Knowle Library so that those of our residents who don’t use the internet will be able to see what has been proposed and make comments in writing. We shall mark this document “work in progress” as the Networks Team is still in on-going discussion with the applicant over possible changes.
  • the Networks Team will talk to Vital Energi about minimising rattling noise generated when traffic passes over metal plates (it appears from the plans that access to/from Cecil Sharp Place will be over a metal plate, and there will be more in London Road)
  • signage advising cyclists to dismount may be needed in certain locations
  • VMS signs on the A40 should emphasise that Headington shops are not affected even when traffic is restricted to one lane between Sandfield and Latimer Roads
  • Disabled access will be checked by a County Officer
  • Some of the diversion route signage shown in the drawings may be confusing and County will talk to VE about removing some of this (see note 6 below)
  • There will be signage advising drivers that there is no access to London Road or to Old Road via residential streets where necessary
  • The emergency services would like Lime Walk South to stay open throughout the works (one lane only) and County believes it would be best for Lime Walk South to operate as a one way street from Old Road in the direction of London Road throughout weeks 1-12 to ensure that (a) fire and rescue vehicles and ambulances can use Lime Walk South to get to emergencies, and (b) to ensure that access to streets in New Headington from Old Road via All Saints Road junction can be maintained for as long as possible. Councillors would like to consult residents about this.
  • Consideration should be given to making roads into Highfield e.g. Lime Walk South “Access only for residents” while works are on-going. Councillors will consult residents on this.

Other points raised include:

  1. The 5/9/16 meeting at County Hall to confirm whether a section 50 licence will be granted will go ahead as scheduled but any outcome will be subject to consent being granted by the Planning Authority
  2. The section 50 licence is in the name of the contractor Vital Energi until the works are completed, and then will be changed to Aviva Investors PLC thereafter.
  3. Work on the Access to Headington scheme in Roosevelt Drive has been scheduled for 7/10/16 (not yet confirmed)
  4. Temporary traffic regulation orders (TTROs) have not been finalised yet but are being drafted
  5. If planning consent is granted on 7th September by the Planning Authority, a further three weeks notice will be needed by the County Council to publish and implement the necessary TTROs before work can start
  6. We learned something new about diversion routes. These confused people (including councillors) last time around. Apparently the aim of a diversion route is to guide people from one end of roadworks to the other end of the roadworks, which is why it led people round almost in a complete circle. We don’t think that diversion route signage is particularly helpful in residential areas, although it may be needed on the Churchill site.

Other more technical details were also discussed, but these are the main points.

Cllrs Roz Smith and Ruth Wilkinson attended this meeting. Ruth is a member of the East Area Planning Committee and wishes to make it clear that her involvement has been only to provide information on road use in Headington Ward to the County Council’s Networks Team. She maintains an open mind on this application without prejudice, and looks forward to reading all comments and related documents and listening to speakers both for and against the application at the EAPC meeting to be held in public on 7th September at the Town Hall at 6pm.

Comments on this application can be sent in by residents to the City Council’s Planning Dept up until 18th August.

 

Sending in comments about the energy pipe application?

We advise residents to read through the construction traffic management plan before sending in comments to the Planning department. You can select this document from a list on this page

In the construction traffic management plan, you will find details of when works will take place in each of the affected roads, what road signage and temporary traffic arrangements will be made, and information like working hours.

The consultation period ends on 18th August. The planning reference number is 16/01565/FUL.

The County Council has not yet sent in its response as statutory consultee on highways and networks issues.

We have requested a briefing to councillors in public on the legal aspects of this application – this is for councillors to find out how many of the legal objections that have been submitted will be admissible as material planning considerations when the application is discussed at planning committee on the 7th September. We shall publish details of this meeting when we know when and where it will take place.

Latest planning news

A mixed bunch this week: two permitted, one refused and one withdrawn.

16/00976/FUL WITHDRAWN

Erection of 1 x 1-bed dwelling (Use Class C3).

Land Rear Of 3 Staunton Road

 

16/01349/FUL PERMITTED

Demolition of garage. Erection of rear outbuilding for use as studio/den.

62 Sandfield Road

 

16/01577/CPU  REFUSED

Application to certify that proposed formation of rear dormer window and formation of Juliet balcony and insertion of rooflights in association with loft conversion.
8 Stapleton Road

 

16/01652/CPU PERMITTED

Application to certify the proposed formation of 1no. rear dormer is lawful.

36 Windmill Road

 

 

Renting out your drive. Is it legal?

We’ve been finding more out about this. There’s a lot of it about in Headington!

Here is the  CLG Planning Policy Guidance

Is planning permission required to rent out a parking space?

The Government’s view is that it should be possible to rent parking spaces without planning permission, provided there are no substantive planning concerns such as public nuisance to neighbours.

There is a public interest from such renting, by providing more cheap and flexible parking spaces for people to park their car and taking pressure away from on-street parking.

The decision on whether renting out a parking space requires planning permission will depend on two principal factors:

  1. The first is whether renting out a parking space results in a material change in the use of the space. Determining whether there has been a material change of use will depend on whether a space is used in a significantly different way to how a parking space would normally be used (irrespective of the identity of the driver). For example, if by renting out spaces, it causes a notable public or neighbour nuisance. A local planning authority will make this decision based on relevant facts and on a case by case basis.
  2. The second is whether there are any other relevant planning considerations, such as planning conditions, which impose restrictions that prevent parking spaces being rented out.

If renting out parking spaces does not amount to a material change of use and if there are no other planning considerations that prevent parking spaces from being rented out then it would not require planning permission.

Planning problems

We are fielding a number of complaints relating to planning currently.

We recognise that there has been a recent decision to change the use of a property in Kennett Road which appears to have conflicted with advice from County Highways re exemption from RPZ permits. We are pushing for the decision notice to be amended.

There have also been some issues regarding length of time to resolve planning applications, particularly those affecting Conservation Areas. We are asking the City Council to improve communications with customers in this area to ensure they are kept informed if there is likely to be a delay in determination.

There is concern about acceptable noise levels and start and end times for works in Latimer Road. It appears that works are starting at 07:00 however we have found evidence to show that building works should not commence till 07:30 because of unacceptable noise nuisance to neighbours. We have asked for clarification on this.

Latest planning permissions

All the following have been granted planning permission

 

16/00928/ADV

 

Display of 1No. internally-illuminated fascia sign and 1No. internally-illuminated hanging sign.

112 London Road Headington

 

 

16/00985/FUL

Demolition of existing rear extension. Erection of a single storey rear extension. Insertion of 3No. front rooflights in association with loft conversion.(amended plans) (amended description)

 

66 Stapleton Road Oxford

 

 

16/01203/CPU

Application to certify the proposed formation of hip to gable and 1no. rear dormer is lawful.

12 Franklin Road Oxford

 

 

 

16/01202/CPU

Application to certify the proposed formation of hip to gable and 1no. rear dormer is lawful.

10 Franklin Road Oxford

 

Latest planning permissions and refusals

16/00430/FUL PERMITTED

Change of use from dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to House in Multiple Occupation (Use Class C4).
21 Franklin Road Oxford

16/00855/FUL PERMITTED

Change of use from dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to House in Multiple Occupation (Use Class C4).
23 Kennett Road Oxford

 

16/01368/FUL PERMITTED

Erection of part single, part two storey side extension.

49 Staunton Road Oxford

 

16/01197/CPU REFUSED

Erection of garden outbuilding.

21 Latimer Road Oxford

 

Works opposite Dorset House

There is now a temporary entrance to land between the corner of Horwood Close and London Road. People have asked what is happening on that site.

A decision was made to approve the following on 5th March 2010 subject to conditions.

Erection of three storey building accommodating 5 flats (1×3, 2×1 and 2×2 bed). Provision of bin and cycle storage.

A subsequent planning application was made for temporary site access off London Road so that construction vehicles could access the site in order to carry out the development. This was approved on 3/7/13 on condition that the work would commence within three years of the permission date.

13/00861/FUL Proposed temporary site access off London Road in relation to planning permission 10/01877/FUL