County Cllr Roz Smith sent in a question about costs to the Cabinet member for Transport. The answer to this question has been published on the County’s website, and is worded as follows.
Councillor Roz Smith
“Access to Headington project – a question about costs
Please could the Cabinet Member give further details on costs relating to the Project:
- expenditure to date on consultants/consultancy work
- approximate costs for the proposed raised pedestrian entry treatments recommended by officers
- approximate financial savings generated from changes to the original proposals made after consultation as per the officer’s report & recommendations
- approximate costs for the changes to the double mini-roundabouts and junctions in Headley Way, and the changes to the mini roundabout junction into the JR Hospital?”
Response by Cabinet Member for Environment
“The information you requested is set out below.
- Expenditure to date on consultants/consultancy work – £517,000
- Approximate costs for the proposed raised pedestrian entry treatments recommended by officers – £6,000 – £8,000 per treatment. Actual cost depends on the amount of drainage work required. Cost also includes traffic management.
- Approximate financial savings generated from changes to the original proposals made after consultation as per the officer’s report & recommendations – no savings have been made by changing theproposals; in fact there is an additional cost for the provision of the retaining wall on the western side of Headley Way which is estimated to cost £246,243. The additional costs will be funded from the existing project budget.
- Approximate costs for the changes to the double mini-roundabouts and junctions in Headley Way -£2.5m (including public realm improvements)
- Approximate costs to changes to the mini roundabout junction into the JR Hospital – £845,000
Costs may change as the detailed design process continues, but these are the latest estimates we have.”
Supplementary question from Councillor Roz Smith
“I note it’s estimated that for every £1 spent there would be a benefit of £3.50 but how would that be monitored and by who.”
Response by Cabinet Member
“Essentially there is a required minimum level of value for money which is part of the agreement for the scheme along with a requirement for before and after monitoring.”